Tuesday, December 9, 2014

Who Are Protecting the IP Children and Youth in the ARMM?

Presented to the Ako Para Sa Bata International Conference
SMX Convention Center, Manila
December 5, 2014

Aveen Acuña-Gulo
Project Manager, IPDEV


Fiyo Teresang! In the Teduray language, it roughly means Good Energies.

My presentation is about the Indigenous Peoples in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.  We have heard questions like, “How can there be IPs in a Muslim Region?”

So basically that’s the problem: the IPs are the “unseen”, the “invisible” members of the area where we are.

Where there are Indigenous Peoples, there are men, women, elderly, children and youth.  Let me begin with saying that what the IPs are going through, the children and the youth are also going through as well.

Who are the IP children and youth?  They are either Teduray, Lambangian, Dulangan Manobo or Higaonon.  They live in 309,720 hectares of ancestral domain claim which include coastal waters.  They generally come from small families: 52% with having four or less family members; and only around 40% having 5-8 family members.  They generally have reached elementary level; but only 11% graduate from the grades, 4% graduate from high school, and 1% finish college.

There are factors affecting children and youth among the Indigenous peoples.  Just like many other children and youth around the world, they are facing tremendous challenges in the context of globalization rapid development.  Let’s try to look at some factors.  I have 27 slides so let me try to compress it in 20 minutes.

* * * *
Birth, rites of passage, arranged marriages, parent-child relationship, spirituality, health, nutrition, unregistered births, gender perspectives, discrimination, cyclical conflict, rape-slays, peer support, pop culture, information technology, literacy, mismatched government interventions, NGO-CSO-FBO-Academe-Business interventions, general lack of government presence at all levels.

These set of factors are by any means not comprehensive and in no particular order; this is only a glimpse of how much work needs to be done for the IPs so that they can catch up after years of marginalization without losing their identity.

Let us try to see how these factors are being practiced, and what are its implications.

Birth.  When a child is born, the father hangs the umbilical cord to a tree that is solely for the newly-born.  The father says a prayer for the child to be as strong as the tree, and firmly rooted to the land.  He also prays that the newly-born child will also bear the values and good characteristics of his/her forebears.

Implication: With the rate that forests are being ravaged, in a way the child – who may now be a grown person – is severed from his connectedness to the land.

[At this point ladies and gentlemen I’d like also to introduce to you someone who is a treasure trove of indigenous knowledge – an IP Woman Leader.  Her name is Conchita Quinlat.  She’s right there.  She is from the Lambangian and Teduray tribe and she wears many hats in her community: she is a day care worker, a teacher, a mother – and her recent engagement is being a member of the IP Communications Group.  The context of the IPComm Group is that if people are not listening to the IPs, then maybe the IPs can listen to what the world outside them is saying and communicate it back to the communities where they come from].

To continue:

Arranged Marriages.  The union of two people is arranged by the parents from both sides.  Most marriages are dowry-driven; where girls who live near the highway or economic centers get higher dowries than their counterpart in the interiors.  Girls are sometimes have already been married by the time they reach their menarche.  Those who are betrothed usually have low self-esteem; thus may affect their own child-rearing capability. 

Current practices may no longer involve actual costs of dowries but tokens.

Men are said to have unlimited number of wives; but this is only done under compelling circumstances, with the guidance and agreement of elders.  So far with IPDEV experience the most that we know are only three.  Having more than one partner not necessarily for marital unions are said to be just a recent phenomenon. 

Unregistered Births.  IP children usually have one name.  With the entry of settlers, if a child is born in a community with strong Christian influence, s/he is given a Western name.  If s/he is born in a community with strong Muslim influence, s/he is given an Arabic name.  For example if you hear names starting with Mo, that means “Father of”; similar with the Mac or Fitz which means “Son of”.  Thus Mokolina means father of Kolina; Mokudef father of Kudef; and so on and so forth.

Thus if a child/person is given other names, his/her being IP is usually not reflected in school records.  Or s/he can be given fake registration records used in human trafficking; and be subject to multiple registrations during elections. 

Gender Perspectives.  While males who manifest female behaviour is not frowned upon in IP society, the person also has to contend with arranged marriages where it is the norm for him to take a wife.  Asserting one’s rights as an LGBT is a recent phenomenon and there is tolerance in general towards unruly behaviour associated with gay youth.

Females have very strong influence in IP society, especially as arbiters.

Rites of Passage.  Girls experiencing menarche are made to jump three steps from their stairs to maintain the number of menstruation days to three.  But the practice is said to be also diminishing in the sense that even if a girl doesn’t jump, the number of days remain more or less constant.  Circumcision among the men is said to have come only within the last 30-40 years, mostly due to social pressure.

Health. The bliyan or healer takes care of the pregnant woman.  When she is due, the bliyan even stays in the house to monitor the actual moment of childbirth.  The current No-Birthing Policy of the government is seen as an affront to the time-honored skills and handed-down gifts of the bliyan, as the policy seems to treat them as dirty and unhygienic.

The IP is also pressured to produce money to be able to buy the medicines prescribed by health personnel, even if they also have time-honored ways of staying healthy with plants and food that have always been within their immediate surroundings and can be had for free.

Health Care.  Rather than go through the indignity of putting up a fight, the IP would rather not go to a health center if only to be treated harshly by health personnel or worse.

Nutrition.  The IP has sulagad, which is the IP concept of Food Sovereignty has been there long before modern civilization even coined the word.  But feeding programs given to IP children include what is now called Killer Whites: white rice, white flour, white sugar, milk.  This is not the diet of the IP.  The lure of commercially-produced food is robbing children and young people of real nutrients.  One implication of this is that mothers now seem to believe that it is the duty of government to nourish her own children.

Parent-Child Relationship.  In an IP community, the family is not nuclear, but clannish.  Today parents have to juggle their parenting roles with the challenges that they have to face every day, which include the constant threat of encroachment into their ancestral lands.  They have to look after their security inasmuch as those who encroach into their lands are usually armed.

Today’s youth among the IP is also confronted with the fact that their elders are being killed because of land conflict.  Due to lack of legal support, these cases often go unresolved and the calls of young people for justice and protection go unheeded.  This leaves another generation of young people who are trying to figure out the anger and confusion they feel within.

Parents also leave their families to work as OFWs.  Absentee parenting leaves the IP child to ask life questions from his age group who generally doesn’t necessarily know any better. 

Peer SupportLoyuk, or peer support among the IP has always been present in many of their socio-economic activities: farming, fishing, hunting, learning.  The increasing gap between young people and their parents also limit the guidance a child is supposed to get.

Spirituality.  The IP child is confronted with the concepts and values of two dominant religions: Chistianity and Islam over his own indigenous spirituality.  Christianity is divided futher into Episcopal, Baptist, Catholic and folk Christianity; in the same way that Muslims has its own folk practices that are perceived to be Islamic.

The IP child is also confronted with the fact that his sacred grounds are being logged, deforested, mined, and replaced with plantations.  While places of worship for Christians and Muslims are actual buildings, the places of worship for an IP are mountains, rivers, rocks, trees – which were erected not by humans but by nature.  Implication: If someone occupies or destroys your place of worship, what would you feel?

(Note: The very first slide in my presentation shows the pilgrimage site of the Teduray and Lambangian Tribes.  If Muslims have Mecca and Christians have the Holy Land, Mt Firis is for the IPs.  This sacred mountain was occupied by MILF in 1997 to set up Camp Omar.  The camp has recently been taken back by the Armed Forces of the Philippines and the IPs are now gradually returning back to their ancestral land).

Pop Culture.  Alcoholic beverages came with the entry of settlers; choice of partners as an individual choice is a recent influence of mainstream society; drug use is already seen among IP youth; young people become vulnerable to gang wars and rape in hangout places like dances and videoke joints. 

Information Technology.  Relationships that are developed through texting and social media is seen as a strain between parents and young people. 

Rape-slays.  The customary laws have a way of resolving rape cases in a discreet way where only the immediate families of aggressor and aggrieved are involved.  Rape-slays are a recent phenomenon attributed to drug use and easy access to pornographic material through the digital age.  Indigenous forms of conflict resolution for rape-slay cases already seem to be inapplicable because many of the present-day rape cases already involve killings.

Discrimination.  Recent cases of discrimination involve a Teduray mother and a Teduray high school student.  The mother’s premature baby (7 months old) died after falling off the delivery table in the Cotabato Regional Hospital because she was not given immediate attention in the emergency room.  The high school student was made to stop her dance midway because the teacher thought it has no relation to Linggo ng Wika.

Cyclical armed conflict.  Young people are recruited into the Moro armed fronts.  The latest being the Bangsamoro Islamic Armed Forces.  Shortly before that was the MILF; then earlier back, the MNLF, Tutpik.  They are also recruited by private armed groups and cattle rustlers.  Families of these young people also cannot refuse the invitation for fear of their security.

Low literacy rates.  Projects, usually infrastructure, have reached IP communities.  IPDEV has assessed quite a number; but these are either not fully utilized, neglected, used for some other purpose, or not functioning at all.  This could be attributed to the low absorptive capacity of the community for external inputs; or that the priority of the community is something else.  And since governance has a lot to do with transparency and accountability, transparency can only mean something if people know how what to look for; and accountability can only mean something if people know how to count.  That said, projects can be effective if people know how to read and write and count.

Mismatched interventions.  School buildings instead of schools; clinics/hospitals instead of health care; water systems instead of water source preservation; commercial inputs instead of sustainable--not financing dependent, agriculture.  People are subjected to trainings left and right without necessarily addressing the education part. 

What are the implications? The culture of dependence is innocently promoted with the proliferation of external assistance thus contradicting sustainability.  Bayanihan or communal effort is dismantled because every step of say, agricultural production cycle requires money; even paid manual labor is already hard to come by because people have liquid cash to spend coming from the Conditional Cash Transfers (4Ps).

NGOs CSOs FBOs Academe Business.  That the people do not feel the presence of government is fertile ground for non-government organizations, civil society organizations, faith-based organizations, academe and business to intervene without government as impartial referee.  Thus, each sector comes in with their own set of vision, agenda; their own set of rules and ways of doing things – thus confusing the community further.  Among these sectors, it is usually business that outruns government because it is always profitable to engage with the rest of the other sectors.

Conflicting Government Policies. Policies on sustainable development have a disconnect with the environment.  IPRA, DAR, DENR, Mining Laws.  Ancestral Domain Sustainability and Protection Plans of the Teduray, Lambangian and Dulangan Manobo do not include monocrop plantations and mining. 

Indigenous forms of weather forecasting is now known as ethnometeorology; sulagad is biodynamic farming (it’s a step above organic farming and sustainable agriculture); the use of indigenous plants as medicines is ethnopharmacology – which means, the so-called modern civilization has just come up with names of something that has always been there.

Bangsamoro Basic Law.  IPRA is a peace agreement that was forged by the Philippine Government with its Indigenous Peoples.  RA 8371 was fought without a united armed confrontation with government but in the legal battlegrounds of congress. 

Provisions on IPs, children and youth have already been incorporated into the draft BBL which is now under review by congress.  This is seen to be another duplication of conflicting policies that run the danger of not being implemented properly if at all, including the law that created the ARMM. 

Implication: Government has a lot to prove that it will not make a repeat of neglecting the IPs brought about by previous laws.  Culture cannot be legislated; and no government -- if it has wisdom -- can afford to lose its own cultures.

General lack of government (as duty bearers) to respond to the needs of the IPs in general and their children and youth in particular.  Duty bearers are government – its officials and employees at all levels who are sworn to protect its people.  With government officials and employees who continue to manifest preference over personal/familial interest from common good, the fear that violations on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, their children and youth will continue, is validated.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

Education-centered intervention.  Any intervention can only be effective if IP children and youth know how to read and write and count.  Where there is a child who is willing to learn and someone who is willing to teach and learning takes place there is a school.

Results-oriented Research.  Indigenous Skills Systems and Practices have been there since time immemorial.  It’s a race against time to have these documented.  And more importantly, not just research for research’s sake – but for the benefit of the IPs.

Free Prior Informed Consent.  Before any intervention can be done on ancestral land, there should be FPIC.  In short, it is only rightful that we (government or non-government, miners or plantation companies, etc), ask permission from them and tell them our intentions in a language and process they understand.  Not just making them sign documents.

Make duty-bearers accountable.  It is not wise to duplicate what government is supposed to be doing.  Government is duty-bound to protect its people.  The rest of us can only bridge the gap between the duty bearers and the rights holders – and in the context of our conference, the IP Children and Youth.  Let us work to make government – the duty bearers, function.

CONCLUSION:

The Indigenous Peoples have sustained themselves through thousands of years.  The survival of the IPs also means the survival of its men, women, elderly, youth and children.  They have been there since time immemorial; they are meant to continue for generations to come. 

And since an indigenous person is always connected to the land, may our intentions towards them be also connected to the land.

May we all live long.  As they say in the Teduray language: Meuyag!


* * * * *

No comments:

Post a Comment